Latinos Don’t Vote, But Why Should They?

(Vox Efx/Flickr)

(Vox Efx/Flickr)

The Los Angeles Times just did a front page story on the Latino vote. Wow! Wait! The article says Latinos voting is all huff and puff. Well I am so flabergasted that I wanted to respond by saying: You are right, for now.

I have never had a Latino family member or friend tell me they are going to vote to “make a difference” or to increase Latino influence. Never. In fact, voting rarely comes up as a topic of conversation. The answer to why that is is simple, super simple. As my old boss Dean Tipps would say, “Voting is a social behavior.” It is like smoking: you either do or you don’t. Most Latinos don’t vote. (Insert long and expensive study here.)

There are ways to facilitate an increase in Latino voting. This is especially true among Latinos who are more likely than other voters to work multiple jobs and longer hours. I’m a big fan of early voting at ATM-like kiosks at malls, shopping centers, grocery stores, laundry mats or local schools. Hell, I am even down to put a voting machine at a local pot dispensary.

I am also a huge fan of having candidates and ballot measures that are actually worth getting up early on election day for. Put a $20 minimum wage on the ballot, and guess what happens? My male uncles and cousins all call me to ask how to vote. Put a candidate for governor on the ballot that wants 20 students per classroom, free lunch for all students and 15,000 summer jobs for California teenagers, and guess what happens? All my female aunts and cousins call my sister to ask her how to vote. But this won’t happen because the powerbrokers that fund elections are too closely connected to the political status quo and the wealthy corporations that give them their allowance.

But there are things we can control and should do. Most notably, we need leadership of ideas, strategies and goals. It used to be that a life of working to advance an agenda for one’s community meant a life of humble living and limited fame and status. Even if leaders and organizations had respect and recognition in the community they served, only in rare moments did they expand beyond a targeted base. (The United Farm Workers grape boycott comes to mind.)

(david gee/Flickr)

(david gee/Flickr)

Today’s activists and civic leaders have limited and inauthentic ties to real communities and people. Most efforts get their stamp of approval, not from the community, but rather from Democratic-establishment foundations, environmental organizations and organized labor. (Insert long and expensive grant proposal here.) The focus is on working together with one another and in unison. But unison seems to be to work on whatever the big donors and foundations want. The problem is that it is human nature to focus on the issues you care about and to see anything else as from the outside or not relevant, even if you don’t necessarily disagree with the focus or message.

I do believe Latinos will vote in huge numbers. But not until there are things on the ballot that have energy and support in the hearts and minds of Latino voters. First we need to drop this stereotypical notion that immigration is the issue that drives Latinos. Latinos often do care about the racist tone of attacks on immigrants, but U.S. citizen Latinos do not have immigration issues themselves, but can of course relate. Truth is those voters actually care more about issues that affect them directly.

If you listen, working Latino America wants a raise, a better job, better health care, more time off from work, safer communities and respect from white Americans. This is all attainable. But we cannot expect our Latino elected leaders to move this agenda via legislation. The truth is they lack the leadership, ideas and, worst of all, they lack the sustained fortitude for a protracted battle with the corporate giants that fund politics and have created the most one-sided America in decades. We have to come up with something better to motivate U.S. citizen Latinos than we need immigration reform (for other people).

White voters understand that voting is how they can influence, if not control, their political, social and economic prospects and opportunities. African American voters understand that the struggle for justice and equality was tough and did win the vote as a practical gain that has improved their lives over the last 50 years. But it seems to me that for the greatest challenge facing Latinos in America is the lack of value that is placed on their work and their services. More importantly, if you ask a random Latino if they know of anyone that is actively working on a campaign to improve their lives, you will get a look you should take a picture of. So we can blame whomever we want, write a million proposals, and buy all the pan dulce and coffee we want.

Until we demand real leadership and provide it, Latinos won’t vote in huge numbers. Why should they?


Javier González is the founder and principal of Tell That Story. He has over 20 years of experience in labor, community and political organizing. You can follow Javier on Twitter @javgonz.

, , ,
Tell Us What You Think!
rikimaru says:

The Talmud must not be regarded as an ordinary work, composed of twelve volumes; it posies absolutely no similarity to any other literary production, but forms, without any figure of speech, a world of its own, which must be judged by its peculiar laws.
The Talmud contains much that is frivolous of which it treats with great gravity and seriousness; it further reflects the various superstitious practices and views of its Persian (Babylonian) birthplace which presume the efficacy of demonical medicines, or magic, incantations, miraculous cures, and interpretations of dreams. It also contains isolated instances of uncharitable “ judgments and decrees against the members of other nations and religions, and finally it favors an incorrect exposition of the scriptures, accepting, as it does, tasteless misrepresentations.

The Babylonian” Talmud is especially distinguished from the Jerusalem or Palestine Talmud by the flights of thought, the penetration of mind, the flashes of genius, which rise and vanish again. It was for this reason that the Babylonian rather than the Jerusalem Talmud became the fundamental possession of the Jewish Race, its life breath, its very soul, nature and mankind, powers and events, were for the Jewish nation insignificant, non- essential, a mere phantom; the only true reality was the Talmud.” (Professor H. Graetz, History of the Jews).
And finally it came Spain’s turn. Persecution had occurred there on “ and off for over a century, and, after 1391, became almost incessant. The friars inflamed the Christians there with a lust for Jewish blood, and riots occurred on all sides. For the Jews it was simply a choice between baptism and death, and many of them submitted to baptism.
But almost always conversion on thee terms was only outward and false. Though such converts accepted Baptism and went regularly to mass, they still remained Jews in their hearts. They were called Marrano, ‘ Accursed Ones,’ and there were perhaps a hundred thousand of them. Often they possessed enormous wealth. Their daughters married into the noblest families, even into the blood royal, and their sons sometimes entered the Church and rose to the highest offices. It is said that even one of the popes was of this Marrano stock.

rodrigvm says:

Javier you are right in most of your comments, the only thing I would correct is that the LA Times writer does not understand Latino politics at all. Latinos do not vote in miterm elections so looking at data from 2014 is bogus and a bit dishonest. The other point you make is true but so are most people motivated by things that benefit them directly remember Sensenbrenner? remember Prop 187? In the end Latinos are motivated (like the old study which most people are not familiar with, the National Latino Political Survey foudnd Latinos are conservative in certain social issues —-and changing especially millenials—-and liberal in economic issues. Finally, your point is real about the lack of mobilization of Latinos done by the Democratic Party, especially in safe districts. This was revealed by a antropological ethnographic study longtime ago…Martha Menchaca. 1994. “Latino Political Attitudes and Behaviors in Five Neighborhoods.” in Rodolfo O. de la Garza et al. Barrio Ballots: Latino Politics in the 1990 Elections. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.