Keep Your Inner Werebigot at Bay: Don’t Dress Up as a ‘Mexican’

University of Louisville Pres. James Ramsey (far right) poses for a Halloween photo with staff

University of Louisville Pres. James Ramsey (far right) poses for a Halloween photo with staff

Not all Midwestern student newspapers are alike.

Olivia Krauth, editor-in-chief of the Cardinal at the University of Louisville, published an op-ed blasting the school’s president for appearing in a Halloween photo in which he and university staff are dressed as — well, as “Mexicans,” according to them — complete with the stereotypical sombrero, poncho and maracas. Some of the staff members don fake mustaches, while others wear a simple white head covering.

The president’s chief of staff issued an apology on Thursday, saying the president and his staff had “made a mistake and are very sorry.” She also told Louisville’s Courier-Journal that she had met with the school’s Office of Hispanic and Latino Initiatives to express “our deep regret for the hurt this experience has caused.”

But the apology was reported too late to avoid a biting rebuke from the Cardinal‘s head honcho, who hours earlier had written:

The president of a school that prides itself in diversity opted to dress himself and his staff as a culture for Halloween. Not just a culture, but a minority that is frequently faced with prejudice. Not just a culture, but a completely wrongfully depicted culture according to people who are actually in that culture.

There’s a word for this. It’s called racism. …

A year ago, The Cardinal published a flow chart to help students understand if their costume choice was racist or otherwise offensive. A quick scan of my Facebook or Twitter feeds would show that U of L students understand how not to be racist with their costumes (or ever) and why that matters. I’m embarrassed that our president doesn’t have the same knowledge.

I said it once, but I guess Ramsey needs to hear it again — they’re not costumes, they’re people.

"Is your costume offensive?" flowchart (Louisville Cardinal)

“Is your costume offensive?” flowchart (Louisville Cardinal)

Halloween can be a scary time of year for trick-or-treaters of color, what with all the werebigots out on bar crawls or lurking near the punch bowl. You’re out and about in your Star-Lord outfit, having a good time, when all of a sudden you’re ambushed by a white club boy dressed as a Mexican drug trafficker, leaving you screaming on the edge of sanity.

Of course, most people don’t mean to be bigots. It’s merely a side effect of having been born and raised in a society as starkly divided along color lines as the United States. Once you’re bitten, it’s a constant life-long struggle to keep the beast suppressed. Halloween must be as equally unnerving for many Americans, faced with the task of picking a clever costume that doesn’t reveal the monstrosity inside.

I think the Cardinal‘s costume flowchart should be required reading every October for anyone wanting to keep their werebigot at bay, though I’d add a few caveats:

1) If you’re dressed as a person guilty of genocide or other crimes against humanity, change your costume.

2) If you’re dressed as a historical figure you know almost nothing about, change your costume.

3) If you’re dressed as a fictional character who is him or herself based on a stereotype, change your costume.

4) If you’re wearing black riding boots, definitely change your costume.

5) If you’re face is painted a different skin color to match that of a famous person, change your costume (unless that person is former Speaker John Boehner).

I’m sure there are more rules, but these are just some off the top of my head.

A good rule of thumb is to decide on an obscure fictional monster you can dress up as, which should help you avoid unleashing the real, deep-seated monster snarling inside all Americans.

But if you simply cannot fight the urge and your inner werebigot takes control, just be sure to stay indoors — and away from any cameras.


Hector Luis Alamo is a Chicago-based writer and the deputy editor at Latino Rebels. You can connect with him @HectorLuisAlamo.

, , , , ,
Tell Us What You Think!
rikimaru says:

The Talmud must not be regarded as an ordinary work, composed of twelve volumes; it posies absolutely no similarity to any other literary production, but forms, without any figure of speech, a world of its own, which must be judged by its peculiar laws.
The Talmud contains much that is frivolous of which it treats with great gravity and seriousness; it further reflects the various superstitious practices and views of its Persian (Babylonian) birthplace which presume the efficacy of demonical medicines, or magic, incantations, miraculous cures, and interpretations of dreams. It also contains isolated instances of uncharitable “ judgments and decrees against the members of other nations and religions, and finally it favors an incorrect exposition of the scriptures, accepting, as it does, tasteless misrepresentations.

The Babylonian” Talmud is especially distinguished from the Jerusalem or Palestine Talmud by the flights of thought, the penetration of mind, the flashes of genius, which rise and vanish again. It was for this reason that the Babylonian rather than the Jerusalem Talmud became the fundamental possession of the Jewish Race, its life breath, its very soul, nature and mankind, powers and events, were for the Jewish nation insignificant, non- essential, a mere phantom; the only true reality was the Talmud.” (Professor H. Graetz, History of the Jews).
And finally it came Spain’s turn. Persecution had occurred there on “ and off for over a century, and, after 1391, became almost incessant. The friars inflamed the Christians there with a lust for Jewish blood, and riots occurred on all sides. For the Jews it was simply a choice between baptism and death, and many of them submitted to baptism.
But almost always conversion on thee terms was only outward and false. Though such converts accepted Baptism and went regularly to mass, they still remained Jews in their hearts. They were called Marrano, ‘ Accursed Ones,’ and there were perhaps a hundred thousand of them. Often they possessed enormous wealth. Their daughters married into the noblest families, even into the blood royal, and their sons sometimes entered the Church and rose to the highest offices. It is said that even one of the popes was of this Marrano stock.