Cuéntame on Immigration Bill: “Proceed with Caution”

Originally published at Cuéntame.

logo_Web_Cuentame_color2

The ‘Gang of Eight’ Immigration bill contains the toughest and costliest border enforcement measures in U.S. History.

LOS ANGELES, CA – Cuéntame, released the following statement after the release of the “Gang of Eight” bi-partisan supported immigration bill.

“Cuéntame has long said that comprehensive immigration reform must be passed to address the broken system in the United States, but we’re warning our members across the country and legislators to ‘proceed with caution’,” said Axel Caballero, Founder and Director of Cuéntame.

“This bill contains the toughest border immigration enforcement measures in the history of the U.S and it’s clear to us that the militarization of the border was the top priority for passage any immigration reform. It’s a dangerous approach. The militarization of the border is the wrong medicine to fix our broken immigration system; not only are border crossings at a historic low but also when human right abuses of immigrants are at an all time high,” continued Caballero.

The heightened enforcement along the border perpetuates the criminalization of immigration and does not address the causes for immigration at its very roots. Upon further reading, the legislation continues to fuel the military and internal security complex and emphasizes benchmarks and triggers that continue to exacerbate flagrant human rights abuses. “It’s costly on humanitarian terms and on monetary terms, this does not fix the problem. This is the problem,”added Caballero. It is estimated that the border measures will end up costing taxpayers upward of $7 billion to an already record amount being spent on immigration enforcement.

While Cuéntame does welcome the five-year residency for immigrant youth, Caballero stresses the bill lacks important immigrant rights elements that will truly reform immigration policy.

“While we have many concerns with the current piece of legislation we also know that our strength lies in voicing our concerns, which are shared by our supporters across the country. We believe that in the debate to follow we will do so effectively and that Washington will listen in order to protect our community and reunite families who’ve been torn apart unnecessarily. We look forward to strengthening this legislation so that it addresses our concerns and helps build a future where immigration to the U.S. is afforded to everyone.”

***

Cuéntame has become one of the most active and powerful Latino platforms with a strong online an on-the-ground network of partner and supporters. Our focus is to create media content, documentary series, imagery and personal stories to mobilize our community into action and create long-lasting impact. Cuéntame means, “count me in” or “tell me your story”, and that is precisely what we do. We have produced over 500 videos, more than a dozen documentary campaigns – with an audience reach of over 1 million Latinos and growing every day. Our social media presence is one of the most robust within the Latino community with over 107K on Facebook alone. This has allowed us to engage our community around meaningful topics and debates that focus from immigration and immigrant rights to Latino workers, students and media representation.

“Gang of Eight” Immigration Reform Bill: FULL TEXT

Here is the bill submitted by the Senate’s “Gang of Eight” regarding immigration reform. It is 844 pages long. You can download it here. The bill is titled, “The Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act.”

bill

“Gang of Eight” Immigration Bill: Full Text

Rep. Steve King and His Boston Marathon Immigration Reform #NoMames Fail

Memo to Congress: Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) needs to shut up. As reported by Think Progress, today King offered his thoughts about the Boston Marathon tragedy and how it proves that this country should not push for comprehensive immigration reform.

steve-king

Here is what TP shared today:

Representative Steve King of Iowa, a prominent House conservative, says Congress should be cautious about rushing immigration reform, especially after Monday’s bombing in Boston, where three people were killed.

“Some of the speculation that has come out is that yes, it was a foreign national and, speculating here, that it was potentially a person on a student visa,” King says. “If that’s the case, then we need to take a look at the big picture.”

On immigration, King says national security should be the focus now, and any talk about a path to legalization should be put on hold. “We need to be ever vigilant,” he says. “We need to go far deeper into our border crossings. . . .We need to take a look at the visa-waiver program and wonder what we’re doing. If we can’t background check people that are coming from Saudi Arabia, how do we think we are going to background check the 11 to 20 million people that are here from who knows where.”

Does King not even read The Washington Post? The whole issue of a “Saudi” suspect was silenced yesterday:

U.S. law enforcement officials said Tuesday that a Saudi national injured in the Boston Marathon bombing is regarded as a witness, not a suspect.

The Saudi, who is recuperating at a Boston hospital, is in his 20s and is in the United States on a Saudi scholarship to study at a university in the Boston area.

As for the idea of being “vigilant,” we offer the example of hero Carlos Arendondo, who, according to reports, entered this country without authorization:

Amidst the terror of the Boston Marathon bombing on Monday afternoon, there were many great heroes, including Carlos Arredondo — the father of a Marine who lost his life in Iraq in 2004.

Arredondo, 52, can be seen in countless images and videos from the immediate aftermath of the explosion, running towards the area where bomb went off, pulling away debris to help those who had been hurt, and tending to a young man in a wheelchair who seemed to have lost both his legs in blast.

The Costa Rican-born hero, who lives in the Boston suburb of Rosindale, can be seen in the YouTube video below, at times shaking, while describing the traumatic scene that he witnessed.

“I just concentrated on that young man,” Arredondo said. “I tied him up, [his] legs, talked to him, he was conscious, I let him know ‘The ambulance is on the way. It’s okay, it’s okay, nothing happened, you’re okay, wait, wait, stay with me, stay with me.’”

VIDEO: Marco Rubio Talks Immigration Reform on CBS’ “Face the Nation”

This morning Florida senator Marco Rubio (R) made the Sunday talk-show circuit to talk immigration.

rubiocbs

Here is his appearance on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

Rubio is “hopeful” that an immigration agreement will be announced this week. What follows are some selected quotes of what Rubio said today:

I think this bill answers all of the questions that people raise. That’s why it’s taken so long, that’s why we spent so much time on it; that’s why we continue to spend time on it.

This bill does three things that are fundamentally important for our country. It modernizes our legal immigration system – something we need to do no matter what. It puts in place the toughest enforcement measures in the history of the United States, potentially in the world. And it once and for all deals with the issue of those that are here illegally, but does so in a way that is fair and compassionate but does not encourage people to come illegally in the future, and isn’t unfair to the people that have done it the right way.

This is not a theory – [11 million undocumented] are actually here. We’re not talking about bringing millions of people here illegally. They are here now and they are going to be here for the rest of their lives. The proposals in the past that some have advocated is to make their lives miserable so that they’ll leave on their own, or to basically ignore the problem, which is happening now, and is de facto amnesty. And what we’re proposing is to actually deal with them.

If [people] pass [a rigorous background check] … they’ll be given the opportunity to pay an application fee and a fine, and in return for that, they will get a worker permit that will allow them to stay in the U.S.; work, travel and pay taxes.

They will not qualify for any federal benefits of any kind, including Obamacare, and they will have to be in that system for over ten years before they can apply to the existing legal immigration system for a green card – not a special path, the same path as everybody else. And of course, that will be dependent upon certain security measures being met. That means securing the border, universal e-verify, and a universal entry-exit tracking system. If those three things are not in place, that green card process won’t begin, even if the ten years has elapsed.

The fact of the matter is that while I am not in favor of a housekeeper or a landscaper crossing the border illegally, what keeps us up at night is the worry that a terrorist can come across that border one day – or the activities that are being undertaken there now by criminal gangs that are human traffickers. And so this addresses that as well.

Berkeley 4th Graders Start Online Petition to Bring Classmate Back Home from Mexico


Sign the petition here.

We just got this story from a fan of our of Facebook page, and we needed to share it. You can learn more about this story here.

rodrigo

Bring Rodrigo Home – Kids For Kids!​

Rodrigo Guzman was a happy nine-year-old fourth grader at Jefferson Elementary School in Berkeley, California. On January 10, 2013, Rodrigo and his parents, returning home from a trip to Mexico, were detained in Houston, Texas.

After hours of questioning, ICE (Immigration Control Enforcement) determined that the family’s visas had expired. The entire family was then sent back to Mexico and were told that they could not apply for a visa for at least five years. They were not allowed to store their possessions nor say good-bye to the many friends they have made in Berkeley.
Rodrigo is having to make major adjustments in Mexico. He barely speaks Spanish, his parents are struggling to find work and he has difficulty adjusting to school. Rodrigo can’t accept that he isn’t allowed to come back to the only home he has ever known in Berkeley.

His classmates and parents are angry but determined to bring him back. They are willing to go to D.C. to ask Congress to return him. Will you sign our petition?

Please forward it to your family and friends.


Sign the petition here.


One of his classmates wrote the following letter to President Obama:

Kyle Kuwahara’s letter to President Obama:

February 4, 2013

Dear President Obama,
My name is Kyle Kuwahara and I’m a fourth grader at Jefferson Elementary
School in Berkeley, California. Recently my class learned that our classmate,Rodrigo Guzman left for vacation to Mexico and wasn’t allowed to come back to his home in California. We also heard that he can’t come back for five years because his family had problems with their visa.

I am asking you as the President of the United States to allow Rodrigo and his family to return to their home here in California.

It is really important to us that he is allowed to come back. He has been in our school for five years and he is a friend of mine. Rodrigo is not free to come back.

In school we are learning about all these important people like Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks who fought for people’s civil rights and freedom.

So what about Rodrigo’s freedom? Who is fighting for his freedom?

This is our time to stand up like Cesar Chavez, Yuri Kochiyama and Dolores Huerta to fight for Rodrigo’s rights. We have to fight for Rodrigo’s rights because he is not able to do it himself!

Today I’m writing to you on Rosa Park’s 100th birthday to do the right thing. To allow Rodrigo and his family to return to their home, school and friends in Berkeley. We must protect Rodrigo and make sure he gets his freedom.

You are our President and the most important person in the United States. You are responsible for protecting everyone’s civil rights.

Please save Rodrigo!

Sincerely,
Kyle Hisao Yee

Boston Globe’s Double Standard Continues with Undocumented Irish Nanny’s Murder Case

Want to know another reason why we decided to launch The Latino Rebels Foundation? Just look at the news coming from today’s Boston Globe, regarding the murder case of Aisling Brady McCarthy. The latest news about this case just broke on Boston.com (the Globe’s online platform) under the following headline: “Irish nanny Aisling Brady McCarthy charged with first degree murder in toddler death.”

What we find so curious is that Brady McCarthy is undocumented; she is not authorized to live in this country, having illegally entered this country several years ago. But you wouldn’t know that from the Globe’s latest news. See how long it takes until you get to that fact. This is the excerpt from the actual story:

Aisling McCarthy Brady

Irish nanny Aisling Brady McCarthy has been charged with first-degree murder in the death of a one-year-old girl she had been caring for in a Cambridge apartment, Middlesex District Attorney Gerard T. Leone Jr.’s office said today.

Previously, Brady McCarthy had only been charged with assault and battery following the death of Rehma Sabir in January, and her attorney has repeatedly said that Brady McCarthy has been wrongly accused of harming the child.

But today, prosecutors said a Middlesex County grand jury has returned indictments of first degree murder and assault and battery on a child causing bodily injury against the nanny.

An arraignment date has not yet been scheduled.

According to prosecutors, public safety personnel responded to Ash Street in Cambridge on Jan. 14 after the child was found unresponsive. The child was rushed to Boston’s Children’s Hospital where she was pronounced dead on Jan. 16.

Brady McCarthy pleaded not guilty to a charge of assault and battery on Jan. 22, and has been held on $500,000 cash bail. In hearings in Cambridge District Court, defense attorney Melinda Thompson has repeatedly said Brady McCarthy is innocent of murder, and also repeatedly demanded that prosecutors officially determine the child’s death cause of death.

Thompson could not be reached for comment this afternoon.

In a statement, prosecutors said they now have established the cause of Sabir’s death, which has not been publicly disclosed until today.

“The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner conducted an autopsy and ruled that the cause of death is blunt force head injuries, and the manner of death is homicide and not accidental,’’ prosecutors said in the statement.

According to prosecutors, investigators have concluded that Brady McCarthy was alone with the infant when the fatal injuries took place.

“It is alleged that on January 14, the child was in the care of the defendant, her nanny,’’ prosecutors said in the statement. “Through their investigation, including interviews with witnesses, police concluded that the defendant had sole custody of and contact with the child during the time that the child sustained the abusive head trauma injuries that caused her death.’’

Brady, a native of Ireland who has been in the country illegally, faces deportation to Ireland if she is freed from state custody, according to the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.

Did you count? That would be 12 paragraphs into the story. The interesting part of all this is that The Globe doesn’t seem to have any problem bringing up a person’s immigration status in other stories, such as this one from September 28, 2011, titled “Illegal immigrant in murder case had prior arrest.” Let’s see how long it takes for the person’s status to get reported:

Scituate police arrested an illegal immigrant from Brazil for motor-vehicle violations three months before he allegedly stabbed his former girlfriend to death in a brutal attack this week, reigniting debate over whether Massachusetts should participate in the federal Secure Communities program.

Five words into the story. In the opening paragraph.

Here’s another one from September 8, 2011 from the Globe, titled “Emotions run high in Milford over death blamed on immigrant.”

Here’s the beginning of the story. Let’s count:

MILFORD – More than 200 people demonstrated against illegal immigration last night outside Milford’s town hall, where Ecuadoran officials offered condolences to the family of a local man allegedly killed by an illegal immigrant who was driving drunk.

Matthew Denice, 23, was riding a motorcycle on Aug. 20 when Nicolas Guaman, 34, allegedly struck him with a pickup truck and dragged him hundreds of yards before stopping. Denice died of his injuries.

Guaman, an immigrant from Ecuador living illegally in the US, faces numerous charges, including vehicular homicide while under the influence of alcohol.

For those playing at home: Undocumented Irish nanny who is charged for killing a toddler? Bury the information about her immigration status. But for previous examples of two men who are from Latin America, committed crimes and are also here in this country illegally? Mention their status almost immediately and emphasize their criminality.

Words matter, and The Boston Globe completely failed on this one. Brady McCarthy is “illegal.” Why the double standard?

GOP Rep. Tim Huelskamp Goes Into “Latino Denial” Mode

The following post comes from Think Progress and it is example #1,200 as to why some Republican politicians still don’t get it, and probably never will.

1340893554-screen_shot_2012-06-28_at_9.24.57_am

This week’s GOP Latino Denial winner is Rep. Tim Huelskamp. Here is what he said on the radio earlier this week:

“[It's] very discouraging,” Huelskamp told conservative radio host Steve Deace on Tuesday, that Republicans are trying “to win votes from the so-called ‘Hispanic voter.’” The conservative congressman argued that trying to persuade Latino voters to become Republicans was “very distracting” because their policy preferences are too disparate. He then conceded that Democrats had done far better winning their votes:

HUELSKAMP: If you’re going to talk about giving a pathway to citizenship before you seal the border. They made a mistake in ’86; I’m not going to repeat that. That’s not going to go through the House. What is interesting and very distracting and very discouraging is, Steve, after the election, the general discussion from Republicans in Washington was, we’ve got to do everything we can to win votes from the so-called “Hispanic voter.” And I say so-called because there’s all kinds of varieties of beliefs within that immigrant community. And the idea that suddenly, instead of voting 70 percent for the Democrats, somehow they’re going to start voting for Republican? No. What Republicans need to do is get off their rear ends and go out, outside of Washington, and talk about what they’re for!

Whether Huelskamp likes it or not, U.S. Latino voters see immigration reform as a personal matter, regardless of their politics. As Latino Decisions states:

Latino Decisions released new polling data today highlighting why immigration reform has become the number one political issue for Latino voters, and the answer is close personal connections between Latino voters and Latino undocumented immigrants.  The poll finds that 58% of Latino registered voters now cite immigration reform as the top priority for the Congress and President, up from 35% in November 2012.  One reason is that 63% of Latino voters say they personally know someone who is an undocumented immigrant, either a member of their family or a close personal friend.  Further, 39% of Latino voters say they personally know someone, or a family who has faced deportation or detention for immigration reasons, and increase of 14 points over 2011, when 25% of Latino voters said they personally knew someone who had faced deportation or detention.  It is clear that the immigration reform issue is one that Latinos agree with in principle, but that Latino voters are also directly connected to, and intertwined with the undocumented immigrant population in the United States.

If Huelskamp sounds familiar to you, he was the one who gave that bizarre interview last year on Morning Joe.

Powerful “Ice El Hielo” Video Shines a Strong Lens on #Not1More Campaign

Today the National Day Laborer Organizing Network released a powerful new video for its #Not1More series.

not1more-924x660

For more information visit NotOneMoreDeportation.com Music by La Santa Cecilia. Give the band a like here. They are amazing.

Schumer Says Draft of Bipartisan Immigration Bill “Hopefully” Ready by End of This Week

This morning on CBS’ Face the Nation, two members of the bipartisan Gang of Eight, Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY), talked about the current developments in crafting a comprehensive immigration bill. Schumer said that an initial draft of a bill will “hopefully” be ready by the end of this week, while both the senators said that the process is just the beginning. They also said some other interesting things from the quotes we share later in this post, including this quote from McCain: “”We need to have a path to citizenship and we need to have secure borders. And we also have to address the issue of 40% of the people who came here illegally, they didn’t cross our borders, they came on a visa and overstayed their visa, and that means we have to have a robust guest worker program so that people will not hire someone who is here illegally.” Did you hear that, German homeschooling family facing deportation?

chuckmccaing

Here is the full video. The immigration sessions begins at 2:43 of segment.

The senators shared several points, including these:

Schumer’s comment about the prospect of a bipartisan agreement: “I think we’re doing very well, I think we hope that we can have a bipartisan agreement among the eight of us on comprehensive immigration reform by the end of this week.” When pressed about this claim, Schumer said that it was “hopefully by the end of this week.”

McCain about Senator Marco Rubio’s reported last-minute reluctance to a final version of the bill: “He’s been very helpful and important in this whole effort that we’ve been making. He’s reached out to conservative sides, including talk-show hosts and others. Marco has been very important.”

After sending Schumer a little Senate love, McCain said the following: “We need to have a path to citizenship and we need to have secure borders. And we also have to address the issue of 40% of the people who came here illegally, they didn’t cross our borders, they came on a visa and overstayed their visa, and that means we have to have a robust guest worker program so that people will not hire someone who is here illegally. And finally can I just say that we need to have a secure border because back in 1986… when our beloved Ronald Reagan, we gave amnesty to three million people, and we promised that we would secure the border, we now have 11 [million]. I’ve got to assure the people of this country and Arizona that we’re not going to have a third wave 10, 15, 20 years from now. And most Americans agree that if you pay back taxes, if you pay a fine, if you learn English, if you go to the back of the line, then you can, and should be, eligible for a path to citizenship.”

Later in the segment Schumer said: “There are always disagreements on each one, but the desire to of all eight to meet in the middle and come to an agreement is so much more important than each little thing that we might prefer one way or the other… has carried through this far. And I am very hopeful and optimistic [it] will carry us through the whole way.”

McCain followed up : “There will be a great deal of unhappiness about this proposal because everyone didn’t get what they wanted. There are entrenched positions on both sides of this issue, as far as business and labor. But I’ve also got to give some credit to both business and labor. They have engaged in some fairly good-faith negotiations, and I’d like to give them a little credit here as well.”

Schumer agreed, and said the following: “Well, there’s a long road. We first have to go through committee, and Senator Leahy has agreed, and we have that we will go to through a full markup. There are people on both sides who are against this bill, and they will be able to shoot at it in the committee, but John was there in 2007, and that’s sort of a good thing, because in 2007, we didn’t go through the committee, and then it collapsed on the floor. This will be a test, a crucible. Then hopefully by some point in May, we’ll be through the markup and we can go to the floor, and I am hopeful that we get a good vote on both sides of the aisle. We don’t want this bill to be, you know, 53 Democrats and just a handful of Republicans, because we need broad bipartisan support, particularly to get a bill done in the House.”

Then McCain added: “Some are saying, ‘Well, we’re not having enough hearings, we’re not having enough… first of all, we know the issue. But second of all, the Judiciary Committee will act. There will be amendments. There will be debate. Then it will go to the floor of the Senate. There’ll be plenty of time for discussion and debate. So I reject this notion that something is being railroaded through. This is the beginning of the process, not the end of it.”

Why Did Deportation Case of German Homeschooling Family Get Santorum’s Attention and Make ABC News?

I will be honest with you: I did a major double-take when the Facebook page of Rick Santorum posted the following plea this afternoon:

Santorum

Yes, the same Rick Santorum who said this at a Republican presidential debate:

Q: [to Santorum]:We heard from Gov. Romney, that self-deportation, or illegal immigrants leaving the country voluntarily, is a possible solution.

SANTORUM: I actually agree with Governor Romney. The bottom line is that we need to enforce the laws in this country. We are a country of laws. My grandfather came to this country because he wanted to come to a country that respected him. And a country that respects you is a country that lives by the laws that they have. And the first act when they come to this country, is to disobey a law, it’s not a particularly welcome way to enter this country. We have to have a country that not only do you respect the law when you come here, but you respect the law when you stay here. And people who have come to this country illegally have broken the law repeatedly. If you’re here, unless you’re here on a trust fund, you’ve been working illegally.

Source: CNN 2012 GOP primary debate on the eve of Florida primary , Jan 26, 2012

Santorum’s Facebook post led to a link from a national homeschooling association that is petitioning the White House to save the Romeike family from deportation. There is also a plea from an executive for Focus on the Family:

Focus on the Family Executive: Homeschool Asylum Case “Critical”
Thursday, April 4, 2013

Focus on the Family spokesman and Truth Project founder Dr. Del Tackett yesterday declared his support for HSLDA’s efforts to defend the Romeike family. Tackett believes that the U.S. government is siding with the restrictive homeschooling laws in Germany and that this could have serious implications for American homeschoolers.

“[The U.S. government] doesn’t believe that parents have a right to educate their children,” Tackett said. “It is more in line with the National Education Association that homeschooling shouldn’t be allowed. It believes that the government can best educate ‘America’s children.’ It doesn’t want another worldview taught in this country. It wants America’s children to have one worldview and one worldview only.”

In 2008, the Romeikes fled their home in Germany after facing fines and jail time and came to the U.S. seeking asylum, but now, the Obama Administration is opposing their quest for asylum by saying homeschooling is too vague and amorphous to be protected under asylum law. Their case is now set to be argued in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on April 23 by HSLDA Chairman Mike Farris.

In addition to representing the family in court, HSLDA has also launched a petition on WhiteHouse.gov calling on the Obama Administration “grant full and permanent legal status to Uwe and Hannelore Romeike and their children.”

Now, when I saw the word “asylum,” I thought that the Romeikes were fleeing from serious political and religious persecution in Germany. Were they lives and beliefs being threatened? Then I read the letter again. I also checked out an ABC News story that ran on March 31:

A German family that fled to the United States in 2008 to be free to homeschool their children is fighting deportation after a decision granting them asylum was overturned.

Uwe and Hannelore Romeike, devout Christians from the southwest of Germany who now have six children, initially took their three oldest children out of school in their native country in 2006. Shortly after, the German government started fining the family and threatening them with legal action.

Home schooling has been illegal in Germany since 1918, when school attendance was made compulsory, and parents who choose to homeschool anyway face financial penalties and legal consequences, including the potential loss of custody of their children.

To escape such legal action, the family fled to the United States in 2008 and was granted political asylum in 2010, eventually making their home in Tennessee. U.S. law states that individuals can qualify for asylum if they can prove they are being persecuted because of their religion or because they are members of a particular “social group.”

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement challenged the decision to grant the Romeikes asylum to the Board of Immigration Appeals in 2012, claiming that Germany’s stringent policy against homeschooling did not constitute persecution.

The Romeikes were doing what they believed is right, as any parent would. They were doing this for their children, and they would be willing to break the law and risk the consequences of entering a country illegally to give them the freedom to teach and raise their children they way that they want to.

It is an admirable and inspiring narrative, one that plays every day in this country. Yet the Romeikes make ABC News. What about these names: Montaño, Arreola, Arma, and so many others who aren’t named Romeike? Where were the major news cameras during those cases? Where was Rick Santorum? Or all those people who keep saying “illegal is illegal,” calling those who enter this country illegally “criminals,” but are now signing a “Don’t Deport the Romeikes” White House petition? Why the outrage now?

CREDIT: Hispanically Speaking News

CREDIT: Hispanically Speaking News

The Romeikes are not threatening anyone, there are yet another low-priority case that has been tossed into the crucible of deportation proceedings. Their case speaks to how broken our immigration system truly is. Yet does anyone else see the irony that the people supporting the Romeikes have no problem asking the White House to ask for “permanent and legal status,” but are ready to send those who don’t come from Germany back home? You know, the “criminals” who crossed border “illegally”, instead of fleeing to the United States? (Did you notice that the ABC News piece doesn’t even mention the word “illegal” in this specific case or that it doesn’t even say that the Romeikes committed an “illegal act?” They just “fled.” I wonder why.) When one of the Latino Rebels admins addressed this very same double standard on Twitter tonight, a few of the profiles who were telling the Rebels earlier today that we supported amnesty for the “illegals,” had to pause for a second. You want to deport the Romeikes, too? The Twitter-jerk reaction wasn’t as swift.

The Romeike case is just one of thousands of similar stories of real people with real faces. People like Rody Alvarado Peña:

[She] came to the United States from Guatemala in 1995 after suffering vicious abuse at the hands of her husband for more than a decade. At age 16, Alvarado Peña had married a career soldier who raped and beat her, broke mirrors over her head, caused her to miscarry, and beat her unconsciousness. Divorce was impossible without her abusive husband’s consent, and with no shelters or other supports available, Alvarado Peña fled to the United States. She was granted asylum in 1996, but in the years since immigration courts have made conflicting rulings that left her in limbo.

Or these undocumented individuals from Mexico that CNN reported about in 2011:

The man was a Mexican immigrant who had been living in the United States illegally for several years. He was also deaf.

He abandoned Mexico to flee what he called persecution. He said he was socially ostracized, targeted by police. The abuse was too much to bear.

So now he was in California, and had already been ripped off once as he tried to seek asylum in the United States.

“He just stole my heart,” Bajramovic said of the immigrant.

It only took that initial short conversation to realize that “the situation in Mexico is very severe. I realized that there was persecution.”

Bajramovic took his case.

Then the next week, there were more phone calls to her office from deaf immigrants who had entered the country illegally looking for asylum.

As of this week, Bajramovic has had 30 deaf immigrants complete asylum interviews with the pertinent authorities, and has another 30 such clients awaiting their turn. They come from several countries, though the majority are from Mexico.

According to Bajramovic, these are the first petitions for asylum by deaf people on the grounds that they are persecuted for their disability. No rulings have been made in any of the novel cases, but critics say that they represent a perversion of the original intent of asylum law. While these types of cases are new, immigrants have long tested the boundaries of what merits persecution for the purposes of remaining legally in the United States.

So these are the “illegal invaders” the nativists fear?

Maybe, just maybe, the Romeike case will help to change a few people’s perceptions about the myths surrounding the undocumented. Maybe Santorum will start posting other pictures of other families who are facing deporting right now. Ok, I seriously doubt that, since it is clear to me that certain immigration narratives will never play well in certain circles, even when those circles decided to look away from their own anti-immigrant rhetoric towards those undocumented they selectively chose to exhibit compassionate for. Imagine if we did this for every undocumented family out there, those just like the Romeikes, who are just trying to do the best for their families, even if it means breaking an unjust law. Then change would certainly occur.

PS to Senator Santorum: whenever you need more pictures of families facing the tragedy of deportation every day, just like the Romeikes, let me know and I will send you them to you? A move like that would get my attention. In the meantime, stay hypocritical.

***

Julio (Julito) Ricardo Varela (@julito77 on Twitter) founded LatinoRebels.com (part of Latino Rebels, LLC) in May, 2011 and proceeded to open it up to about 20 like-minded Rebeldes. His personal blog, juliorvarela.com, has been active since 2008 and is widely read in Puerto Rico and beyond. He pens columns on LR regularly. In the last 12 months, Julito represented the Rebeldes on CBS’ Face the NationNPR,  UnivisionForbesand The New York Times.