Yesterday media outlets began to report about Jeb Bush’s new book, “Immigration Wars” and his positions as he considers a 2016 run to the White House. The news led many to conclude that Bush had suddenly changed his views on immigration, causing a very strong reaction with reformers. When our own Charlie García tweeted a National Journal story about about the issue, the Twitter account of Bush’s son, Jeb Bush, Jr. tweeted back to García, saying that his father’s position was not a flip flop.
Many have seen Bush as one of the GOP’s most immigration-friendly voices in the country. In this NBC News segment, Chuck Todd clarifies Bush’s immigration position during a interview with the former Florida governor.
As TPM reported yesterday, the reaction to Bush’s stance on citizenship for the estimated 11 million undocumented individuals surprised many immigration groups and even fellow Republicans:
After years of building a reputation as the “good” Republican on immigration, Jeb Bush shocked the reform community on Monday by ruling out a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, a position solidly to the right of prominent GOPers like Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL).
The news stunned immigration activists and aides working on a bill and who have long insisted that anything short of citizenship is a dealbreaker for reform — especially given that Bush wasdecisively in the pro-citizenship camp just months ago. It also was a head scratcher for political observers, giving Bush an unexpected opening in 2016 to attack not only Rubio, but several possible presidential candidates, as overly liberal on immigration reform.
“Wow,” Marshall Fitz, director of immigration policy at the liberal Center For American Progress, told TPM in an e-mail. “For a guy who has been a luminary on this issue for the GOP, his endorsement of such a regressive policy is deeply troubling.”
Later in the story, TPM included how a former advisor to Mitt Romney was shocked to hear about Bush’s position:
“Where the hell was this Jeb Bush during the campaign?” the advisor said. “He spent all this time criticizing Romney and it turns out he has basically the same position. So he wants people to go back to their country and apply for citizenship? Well, that’s self deportation. We got creamed for talking about that. And now Jeb is saying the same thing.”
Bush responded in an e-mail to the Herald that he did not advocate “self deportation” as defined by Romney. And he’s right: Bush’s plan is still way more progressive than Romney’s 2012 platform in that it would grant at least some legal status to the undocumented population and possibly citizenship to some young undocumented immigrants. One theory making the pro-reform rounds is that Bush crafted his latest plan in the Romney era when it would have been considered a centrist compromise only to be left behind as party leaders sprinted to the left on the issue after his loss.
“If he stays with this new, ‘let them be workers but not citizens’ stance, it will be a political blunder of huge proportions,” Frank Sharry, the executive director of pro-reform America’s Voice, said in a written statement. “At a time when voters are looking for steady, principled leaders and Republicans are supporting citizenship in greater numbers, this should be Jeb Bush’s moment. Yet his disturbing flip-flop on immigration citizenship and tack to the right ahead of a potential presidential primary suggests that he’s misread the moment.”
Earlier today POLITICO published a piece about Bush’s appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” where Bush clarified his positions:
Bush said on “Morning Joe” on Tuesday that while he favors a path to “legalization,” not citizenship, he would not oppose an immigration deal that granted illegal immigrants in the U.S. eventual citizenship if there were a way to do so without giving them an advantage over those foreigners trying to come to America legally.
“If you can craft that in law where you can have a path to citizenship where there isn’t an incentive for people to come illegally, I’m for it, I support it,” Bush said. “I don’t see how you do it, but I’m not smart enough to figure out every aspect of a really complex law.”
One of Bush’s most active commentators/critics on Twitter has been the profile of Ana Navarro, the 2008 National Hispanic Co-Chair for John McCain and the 2012 National Hispanic Co-Chair for Jon Hunstman. Here are series of tweets that Navarrro has shared in the last 24 hours:
Lost in hoopla re citizenship r very good ideas Jeb offers in book, including special path to citizenship for Dreamers. Give guy some credit
— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) March 5, 2013
Jeb wrote book in wake of ’12 GOP Primary. Think some ideas not his wish list but attempt to bring GOP to table. Tough loss brought to table
— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) March 5, 2013
Jeb book is mixed bag. More liberal on Dreamers & Border Security certification before legalization; more restrictive on citizenship.
— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) March 5, 2013
Coverage re Jeb’s immigration book roll-out reminds me of song: “How could something so right, go so wrong?” I’m confident Jeb will clarify.
— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) March 5, 2013
“@politico: Jeb clarifies that he’s for a fair path to citizenship for undocumented, if can be approved. Thank God! politi.co/WGajWd”
— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) March 5, 2013
@marcacaputo Hate to burst ur bubble. Find ineligibelity for citizenship objectionable. Have said & told Jeb I disagree. Welcome to thruth.
— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) March 5, 2013
Is @CafeConLecheGOP trying to be serious when it says, “Rubio took leadership of the immigration issue?” Give me a break. He was the GOP establishment’s token Hispanic member they assigned to “go deal with your people” when it was clear they had entirely alienated Hispanics. To say he took leadership is an absolute crock unless by leadership you mean trying to seize political opportunity. CCL is always trying to “tapar el sol con su dedo” when it wants to cover up the staunch nativism that is still at the core of their party.
[…] By Latino Rebels […]
The Gnostics derived their http://633cash.com/Games leading doctrines and ideas from Plato and Philo, the Zend-avesta, the Kabbalah, and the Sacred books of India and Egypt; and http://633cash.com/Pengaturan” thus introduced http://633cash.com/Daftar into the bosom of Christianity the cosmological and theosophical speculations, which had formed the larger portion of the ancient religions of the Orient, http://www.cintaberita.com joined to those of the Egyptian, Greek, http://633cash.com/Promo and Jewish doctrines, which the Neo-Platonists had equally adopted in the Occident..It is admitted that the cradle http://633cash.com/Deposit of http://633cash.com/Withdraw Gnosticism is probably to be looked for in Syria http://633cash.com/Berita and even in Palestine. Most of its expounders wrote in that corrupted form of the Greek used by the Hellenistic Jews…and there was a striking http://633cash.com/Girl analogy between their doctrines and those of the Judeo-Egyptian Philo of Alexandria; itself the seat of three schools, at once philosophic and religious, the http://633cash.com/LivescoreGreek, the Egyptian, and the Jewish. Pythagoras and Plato, the most mystical of the Grecian philosophers (the latter heir to the doctrines of the former), and who had travelled, the latter in Egypt, and the former in Phoenicia, India, and Persia, also taught the esoteric doctrine…The dominant doctrines of Plutonism were found in Gnosticism