The TED “Job Creator Myth” Video That Caused TED to Defend Itself

Post to Twitter

This is interesting. First of all, we love TED, just like many people who are on online.

But then it didn't make the following Nick Hanuaer video public, and then Hanuaer started crying censorship. Well, long story short (see Anderson's post for an explanation below), and Hanauer's video was released. You decide for yourself.

Today TED's Chris Anderson had to blog about why Hanauer's video was initially not available for viewing. Here is a bulk of what Anderson wrote on his TED's Posterous:

At TED this year, an attendee pitched a 3-minute audience talk on inequality. The talk tapped into a really important and timely issue. But it framed the issue in a way that was explicitly partisan. And it included a number of arguments that were unconvincing, even to those of us who supported his overall stance. The audience at TED who heard it live (and who are often accused of being overly enthusiastic about left-leaning ideas) gave it, on average, mediocre ratings.

At TED we post one talk a day on our home page. We're drawing from a pool of 250+ that we record at our own conferences each year and up to 10,000 recorded at the various TEDx events around the world, not to mention our other conference partners. Our policy is to post only talks that are truly special. And we try to steer clear of talks that are bound to descend into the same dismal partisan head-butting people can find every day elsewhere in the media.

We discussed internally and ultimately told the speaker we did not plan to post. He did not react well. He had hired a PR firm to promote the talk to MoveOn and others, and the PR firm warned us that unless we posted he would go to the press and accuse us of censoring him. We again declined and this time I wrote him and tried gently to explain in detail why I thought his talk was flawed. 

So he forwarded portions of the private emails to a reporter and the National Journal duly bit on the story. And it was picked up by various other outlets.

And a non-story about a talk not being chosen, because we believed we had better ones, somehow got turned into a scandal about censorship. Which is like saying that if I call the New York Times and they turn down my request to publish an op-ed by me, they're censoring me.

For the record, pretty much everyone at TED, including me, worries a great deal about the issue of rising inequality. We've carried talks on it in the past, like this one from Richard Wilkinson. We'd carry more in the future if someone can find a way of framing the issue that is convincing and avoids being needlessly partisan in tone.

Also, for the record, we have never sought advice from any of our advertisers on what we carry editorially. To anyone who knows how TED operates, or who has observed the noncommercial look and feel of the website, the notion that we would is laughable. We only care about one thing: finding the best speakers and the best ideas we can, and sharing them with the world. For free. I've devoted the rest of my life to doing this, and honestly, it's pretty disheartening to have motives and intentions taken to task so viciously by people who simply don't know the facts.

One takeaway for us is that we're considering at some point posting the full archive from future conferences (somewhere away from the home page). Perhaps this would draw the sting from the accusations of censorship. Here, for starters, is the talk concerned. You can judge for yourself…

Post to Twitter

Ameritrade Founder and Chicago Cubs Owner Ricketts Quickly Distances Himself from Anti-Obama Proposal

Post to Twitter

Looks like certain Republican strategists were ready to run the campaign that they weren't allowed to run against Barack Obama in 2008. The New York Times today broke a story that presented a scenario where a GOP Super PAC would have gone after President Obama for his past associations with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Such a strategy didn't work in 2008, but it looks now that the Super PAC wanted to try it once again, painting a picture that borders of tired racial overtones and guilt by association. Yes, this campaign is going to get ugly.

The strategy document, which according to the Times was managed by Joe Davis and funded by Ameritrade billionaire founder and Chicago Cubs onwer Joe Ricketts, offers a very detailed look into the world of campaign politics. The full page-by-page document can be seen below in our Storify. Here is a bit of what the Times reported today:

The $10 million plan, one of several being studied by Mr. Ricketts, includes preparations for how to respond to the charges of race-baiting it envisions if it highlights Mr. Obama’s former ties to Mr. Wright, who espouses what is known as “black liberation theology.”

The group suggested hiring as a spokesman an “extremely literate conservative African-American” who can argue that Mr. Obama misled the nation by presenting himself as what the proposal calls a “metrosexual, black Abe Lincoln.”

A copy of a detailed advertising plan was obtained by The New York Times through a person not connected to the proposal who was alarmed by its tone. It is titled “The Defeat of Barack Hussein Obama: The Ricketts Plan to End His Spending for Good.”

The proposal was presented last week in Chicago to associates and family members of Mr. Ricketts, who is also the patriarch of the family that owns the Chicago Cubs.

In the meantime, CNN is reporting that the following document has sparked such a negative reaction that denials are flying all over the place now:

Brian Baker, who heads the conservative super PAC supported by Ricketts, said Ricketts would not approve the scheme, as it "reflects an approach to politics that Mr. Ricketts rejects."

"Mr. Ricketts intends to work hard to help elect a president this fall who shares his commitment to economic responsibility, but his efforts are and will continue to be focused entirely on questions of fiscal policy, not attacks that seek to divide us socially or culturally," Baker said in a written statement.

And when asked about the proposal, Mitt Romney was quick to condemn it, according to the Times:

“I repudiate that effort,” Mr. Romney told reporters at an impromptu news conference Thursday in Jacksonville, Fla. “I think it’s the wrong course for a PAC or a campaign.”

Still, someone developed this strategy for Ricketts, and it just goes to show had sad this country has become in the interest on winning an election. In the meantime, Ricketts has some more explaining to do.

Post to Twitter

“Angry Joe Biden” Drives a Point Home About “Wealth Envy” and Succeeds in His Delivery

Post to Twitter

Today in Ohio, Vice President Joe Biden got angry. Really angry. And he has a point about "wealth envy," one of the talking points of the GOP.

Here is what was spot on (around 39 seconds is). This is what the GOP is missing. And angry Biden was pretty effective today.

And by the way, one thing I do resent. I resent when they talk about families like mine that I grew up in. I resent the fact that they they think we're talking about, we're envy [ok, that was a flub, but he was on fire, Ed], it's job envy, it's wealth envy, that we don't dream. My mother believed and my father believed that if I wanted to be President of the United States, I could be, I could be Vice President. My mother and father believed that if my brother or sister wanted to be a millionaire, they could be a millionaire. My mother and father dreamed as much as any rich guy dreams. They [the Republicans] don't get us. They don't get who we are. They don't understand, it seems to me. Again, they're not bad, they just don't get it.

Post to Twitter

Why Carlos Fuentes Matters

Post to Twitter

“Yo no soy mexicano. Yo no soy gringo. Yo no soy chicano. No soy gringo en USA y mexicano en Mexico. Soy chicano en todas partes. No tengo que asimilarme a nada. Tengo mi propia historia.” ― Carlos Fuentes 

“To call me anti-American is a stupendous lie, a calumny. I grew up in this country. When I was a little boy I shook the hand of Franklin Roosevelt and I haven’t washed it since.” ― Carlos Fuentes

Today, Carlos Fuentes died at 83 years old.

To us, Fuentes will always be one of the world's greatest writers. Punto. No matter the language. He was one part of the "El Boom's" Holy Quartet , who along with García Márquez, Cortázar, and Vargas Llosa, transformed literature and our appreciation for it. Yes, Fuentes was Mexican, but he was also a Latin Americanist, as well as a citizen of the world. As proud a Mexican as he was, Fuentes thought beyond that, understanding that politics can be corrupt and ugly, while humanity can be beautiful and complex. And he wrote, even at 83 years old, he wrote.

Fuentes was born in Panama City in 1928, the son of a diplomat, and really didn't come back home to Mexico until he was 16. As a child, he lived in Montevideo, Washington (where he learned to speak fluent English in a public school), Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Santiago, and Quito, and it is ironic that one of Mexico's most beloved writers was almost a stranger in his own country when he came back with his family in 1944. In today's obituary from The New York Times, Fuentes credits his grandmothers' stories from Mexico as the main inspiration for his becoming a writer. We knew that story from the lit classes we took years ago, and at a time when authors of Mexican American descent are being banned by school districts in the US, it is people like Fuentes who remind us why we write in the first place. To keep our stories alive, and our history vibrant.

There was something badass about Fuentes whenever he was asked to comment about his country's political and social ills, or his disdain of Washington politics, or the absurdity from the cult of personality that is Latin American politics. Here was this bilingual man who could tell you to f-off with a little intelligence ("What the United States does best is to understand itself. What it does worst is understand others.") and back it up with prose that would rival anyone else in the world. Sure, there will always be those who think Fuentes was rich, a Mexican elitist, an author who just wrote and never did a lick to make this world better, but that is where his critics are wrong. Because his prose crept into the minds of his readers, his words inspired others and to many, the sight of a Mexican man sharing such eloquence and intelligence when discussing topics that mattered, was powerful. You want to break down stereotypes? Write like Carlos Fuentes, write with an honest voice, and just tell stories.

One of our most memorable Fuentes stories (outside of his accounts regarding his body of work) occurred in 1977, two years after he was appointed Mexico's ambassador to France. Once former Mexican president Gustavo Díaz Ordaz became ambassador to Spain, Fuentes quit. The reason? It was Díaz Ordaz who, as Mexico's president in 1968, had ordered force on student protesters in Mexican City. We are trying to think of what other famous authors at the height of their career would be so public about their beliefs. In this day and age, not many.

Tonight, we went back and checked our Fuentes collection tucked away in our libraries, from a worn copy of a highlighted La muerte de Artemio Cruz to the mural-covered Cambio de piel (we opened it up again tonight and read a passage that screamed 1960s cosmopolitan Mexico, like a freaky lounge scene from Mad Men). Fuentes mattered to us, and we think he will always matter to many.

Fuentes said something once that will always resonate with us: "Don't classify me, read me. I'm a writer, not a genre.” In a world where everyone wants to label you and put you in the box, Fuentes tells us, screw the box, kick yourself out of the box. Just write. Never stop writing, and never stop writing about what YOU want to write about.

No one can define you, you can only define yourself. That is Fuentes to us.

Post to Twitter

Rest in Peace, Carlos Fuentes: Video From One of His Last Interviews

Post to Twitter

We are still absorbing the news of the death Mexico's Carlos Fuentes, one of the greatest writers and literary figures of our time.

We plan to write more about what Fuentes meant to us in the next coming days, but right now we will share an interview Fuentes gave to CBC from late last year. He was a truth seeker until the day he died.

Post to Twitter

DOCUMENTS: Prosecution for Florida Vs. Zimmerman Releases Witness and Evidence List

Post to Twitter

Prosecutor Angela Corey, the lead Florida attorney in charge of the state's case against George Zimmerman, charged for the second-degree murder of Trayvon Martin, released her witness and evidence list.

Besides containing over six pages of witnesses and depositions, the documents also list video from February 26, the night when Zimmerman shot Martin. Here are images of all the documents.

Post to Twitter

Obama 2012 Takes a Page Out of the Newt Playbook: Expose Romney and Bain Capital

Post to Twitter

You knew it was going to happen, but did you think it would happen so soon in the election cycle?

This week the campaign of President Barack Obama released a new video chronicling the 1993 actions by Bain Capital and Mitt Romney in the management of GST Steel in Kansas City. A similar tactic was employed by Newt Gingrich, when Gingrich was running against Romney in the GOP primary.

Here is the long version of the video. Right now, as of tonight, the video has gotten only 30,000 views since its release today.

Post to Twitter

Fortuño Appears on FOX’s STOSSEL and Presents a Bizarro Puerto Rico Full of Public Relations Fluff

Post to Twitter

Originally published in JulioRVarela.com

There is journalism and then there is fluff. FOX's "STOSSEL" show is fluff. One-sided agenda journalism at its worst.

Republican and pro-statehood Puerto Rican governor Luis Fortuño, the incumbent who is trailing in polls to an opponent who has his own issues, is trying to put a spin on an economic situation on the island as he runs for re-election.

Strategy #1: Get on a show where you get the most softball of questions from a supposed journalist.

As for John Stossel?

Try asking actual factual questions, like: Why is your island still stuck at 15% unemployment? Why is your labor force shrinking? Why is public sector employment still growing? If you are so popular, why are you not leading in the polls, even though you claim that you and your opponent are "dead even?" And why are young people leaving the island for jobs in the United States? Also, Fortuño should take credit for one thing: cutting taxes since the rate in Puerto Rico was actually much worse than the mainland, so all he did was bring it down to US levels. So, basically, it is not like Fortuño cut taxes to levels that are favorable.

Sure, taxes in Puerto Rico were high, how hard was it to lower it to levels that match the US?

And why should you need facts to tell your story when you are running for re-election as an incumbent and losing in the polls?

To the Fortuñistas, the following video is the central focus on their re-election campaign.

To the rest of Puerto Rico, it is a sham. And Stossel? Do some more homework about Puerto Rico, and stop pretending that you are all of a sudden an expert about it.

Post to Twitter

Rev. Wright Alleges That Obama Friend Offered Him a Bribe to Stay Quiet

Post to Twitter

Guess the Rev. Jeremiah Wright wants to increase sales of his new book. Reports from The New York Post, WGN TV, Fox NationTMZ and other outlets today are publishing Wright's claims that he was offered a bribe to stay silent by a friend of then-candidate Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign. According to WGN TV, several Democratic leaders are saying that claims are "fiction" and "a stunt to sell books."

Wright, as many recall, was the subject of an intense campaign to discredit then candidate Obama because of the reverend's controversial statements about America. Here is a clip of what WGN TV in Chicago reported:

Wright is publishing a new book and he spent time with the Post to say more about his claims:

"Man, the media ate me alive,” Wright told me when we met in his office at Chicago’s Kwame Nkrumah Academy.

“After the media went ballistic on me, I received an e-mail offering me money not to preach at all until the November presidential election.”

“Who sent the e-mail?” I asked Wright.

“It was from one of Barack’s closest friends.” “He offered you money?”

“Not directly,” Wright said. “He sent the offer to one of the members of the church, who sent it to me.”

“How much money did he offer you?”

“One hundred and fifty thousand dollars,” Wright said.

This campaign has gotten ugly and it will continue to do so. More distractions to follow, for sure.

Post to Twitter

Damn, Don’t Mess With MSNBC’s Tamron Hall

Post to Twitter

Memo to ourselves: if we ever get invited by MSNBC to be on with Tamron Hall and "News Nation", we will try to just answer her questions. This Friday, Hall had The Washington Examiner's Tim Carney to discuss the issues of how the Romney campaign has been handling the spin on stories that talk about his past and also how he is handling questions that he doesn't want to talk about. 

It got so heated that Hall basically just cut Carney's mic off. Don't mess with me. Damn. Next, please. Our take? Carney made his mistake by thinking an MSNBC appearance would make him look good. Also, dude, you got invited to her show. You gotta find your moments to make your points but once you get all Fox on Tamron, what do you expect? As for the FAUX OUTRAGE that Hall did this, people like Bill O"Reilly and Sean Hannity have been doing this for years. Now people will know: don't mess with Tamron Hall.

Below is a full video of the segment from The Daily Caller (the only outlet that captured the entire exchange in a bit more context). Here is a quick transcript of key exchanges that were made:

CARNEY: “[W]hat you’re doing here is a typical media trick. You hype up a story, and then you justify the second day coverage of the story by saying, ‘Oh well, people are talking about it. Here’s how Romney responded to it.’ No. Let’s move on to substantive issues.”

HALL: “Hang on, because you’re kind of in my house here. The problem is this: The story is out there. You’re right. I am not saying that we should belabor what happened 50 years ago. We’re talking about the response by the campaign and by the governor. Not just on this issue.”

CARNEY: “You are bringing up a meta story here, which is what is Romney’s response to this other nonstory? I’m trying to go ‘meta meta’ on you and say here’s the media treatment of the Romney response.”

HALL: “You don’t want me to ‘go’ anything on you because you’re actually irritating me right now. “I’m going to be honest with you … you knew the topics we were going to discuss. You knew them. You agreed. And we are not talking or demeaning — listen, 50 years ago I was a much tougher kid probably than Mitt Romney was in high school. I’m not talking about the issue of whether he was bullying or not. He said he doesn’t remember. To be fair, I cannot say that he does. What I’m asking you about is how the campaign has handled this decision, handled this situation, how he handled the Colorado reporter, how he handled same-sex marriage where he said he agrees with gay parents being able to adopt but he does not agree with same-sex marriage — just the handling of questions beyond the economy. If you’re not comfortable about that, I am A-OK, but you’re not going to come on and insult me. You won’t come on and insult the network when you knew what you were going to talk about. Done. Let me talk to Jimmy. I’m done."

Post to Twitter