Opinion

Congress has a lot to lose and little to gain.

The fight for U.S. citizenship is noble, but it is also not inclusive.

We must speak loudly to take on patriarchy as much as we speak loudly to bring down white supremacy.

The Progressive Caucus is disturbed to have in our ranks a police brutality enabler and apologist.

It’s complicated.

Under the normal circumstances of any other Latin American country, Puerto Rico would be a hotbed of civil unrest.

Unaccompanied migrant youth face labor exploitation and Trump’s orders exacerbate their precarious work conditions.

Middle class white people in our profession are still contributing to scholastic imperialism while at the same time claiming to be more “inclusive.”

The report uses really fuzzy math to paint a false picture of crime-infested communities being overrun by immigrants.

Time for a history lesson.

What better way to stir up a new wave of fear mongering and xenophobic hysteria if not by heightening an existing campaign already underway?

Face the truth.

My sense of loyalty to the United States has always coexisted with a sense of solidarity with the people of Mexico.

Student protesters are confirming that free speech is alive and well at college campuses.

“The institutionalized invisibility of women and nonbinary femmes of color is rooted within Pitzer College.”

Any march for science needs to own and address the politics of science, and be prepared to lead us into a more inclusive future, rather than retracing the missteps of the past.

So what’s wrong with calls to “rigorously enforce” immigration law? Turns out, a lot.

“Exclusively focusing on Trump, whether it’s working with him or resisting his policies, risks creating tunnel vision.”

Trump has forgotten, or more likely dismissed the fact, that his words carry gravitas, especially among the communities he has slated for possible removal.

“I hope you’ll wake up at some point.”

“Our community is fighting a plan to build yet another dirty gas-fired power plant on our coast.”